H&F Leader Criticises Government's Fair Funding Reforms
Says taking a lot from some councils to give a little to others not a solution
Stephen Cowan. Picture: Total Politics
October 21, 2026
Taking money from London councils to redistribute to local authorities across the country is not the solution to the current funding crisis, a Labour council leader has said.
Cllr Stephen Cowan, who leads Hammersmith and Fulham and sits as the chair of the cross-party London Councils group, took aim at his own party for so-called “fair funding” reforms.
The government policy, intended to redirect cash from more affluent boroughs to those in need, has hit authorities in the capital particularly hard, regardless of political affiliation. The borough leader has ruled out a legal challenge to the new arrangements, although other authorities are considering this approach.
Hammersmith and Fulham, Westminster, Kensington and Chelsea, Wandsworth, and the City of London have all been granted permission to increase council tax by more than five per cent next year in light of a likely reduced government settlement.
The borough has said its own share of central funding will fall from £150.5million in 2025/26 to £72.4million over the next four years, leaving an estimated £160million budget gap.
Meanwhile, on Tuesday (20 October) Westminster City Council announced it will cut 520 jobs from its workforce due to a projected funding shortfall.
Cllr Cowan took aim at the reforms during a fringe event hosted by London Councils at last month’s Labour Party Conference.
“I am extremely sympathetic to the situation the government’s in – I don’t think a government’s inherited a worse position,” he said. “I’m sympathetic to it, but I simply don’t think the solution is fair funding.
“It doesn’t raise that much money, and you’re taking a lot of money off some councils to give a little bit to others. So I don’t think that’s the solution in the end.”
He said his authority had pursued a “ruthless financial efficiency programme” which gives constituents “maximum value for money” already.
Last year the London Assembly unanimously passed a motion calling on Sir Sadiq Khan to “urgently lobby the government to reconsider its Fair Funding Review proposals, reverse its planned funding cuts to London boroughs, and ensure that London receives its fair share of funding to meet Londoners’ needs.”
The Mayor did not respond to this motion, but said last November: “I want to reassure Londoners that I will continue to work closely with London Councils and others to make the case for London getting a fairer funding deal as part of this process.”
Kensington and Chelsea, Westminster and Wandsworth councils have already written to ministers to ask them to rethink the new formula. The City of London Corporation has also said it will consider an appeal.
In response, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: “Local authorities decide the level of council tax they wish to set, but we are clear that in doing so they should put taxpayers first.
“We’ve made over £78bn available for council finances next year, with the majority of money un-ringfenced so local leaders can decide how best to spend on their local priorities.
“And we’re fixing an outdated funding system so funding goes where need is greatest, while protecting councils through the transition and ensuring no area faces a cliff edge.”
Kumail Jaffer - Local Democracy Reporter
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |